Enermax Gold: Modu87+ and Pro87+
by Christoph Katzer on January 19, 2010 1:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Cases/Cooling/PSUs
Modu/Pro87+ 600W Voltage Stability and Quality
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79d84/79d84a62e86776477e4d83ad7edd81ab6892fd59" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8ab7/b8ab7cdef024971b20a41685908df50f7e32c5f9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02c40/02c4066d79a9442ae7e733d978c63a4e79b4fd5b" alt=""
The 600W unit has a little better result compared to the 500W unit but we still see 4% fluctuation on the 3.3V rail. The 5V rail seems a little better with this unit with a regulation range of around 2%. The 12V rail has a slightly different regulation ranging from 12.34V down to 11.99V.That is of course still within specification.
Ripple
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/382c7/382c7af1ab7f5777f0a10622a82ff6ce2b0bda3b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c9a9/8c9a94503efb29bb01e8fbe3da3db88a253f7351" alt=""
The ripple looks similar to the 500W unit with the 3.3V rail going up to around 40mV and the 5V rail being able to keep a stable 14-15mV. The 12V rail looks good with only up to 63mV on the 12V1 rail.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31eab/31eab29b8d16c143a52fec7e12c69246747fde2b" alt=""
20% load
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59556/595567626a27e66d2982764fffab5af534ba7390" alt=""
50% load
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f7e7/7f7e7a69001f8e9c53fa09ff3059f923ff6f3f68" alt=""
100% load
59 Comments
View All Comments
rbarone69 - Tuesday, January 19, 2010 - link
I'm sure you're room temp isnt 50 degrees celsius... (122f)rbarone69 - Tuesday, January 19, 2010 - link
Sorry guys, didnt see you actually put it in an environment at 50c. (should read better before commenting)Just curious why you picked such a high temp to test. Do you find that there are cases this warm in rooms with no A/C?
JarredWalton - Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - link
It's a stress test to simulate a hotter case; if a PSU can handle 50C, it can easily handle the more common 30-35C.Christobevii3 - Tuesday, January 19, 2010 - link
Could you hook up some different power supplies and show the difference they draw from the wall versus these at idle and load with a basic quad core, 4GB ram, two hard drive, and 5870 setup? I'm curious if spending $50 more on a power supply is going to actually make that big of a difference over a year of computing cost wise for electricity.- Tuesday, January 19, 2010 - link
In most cases it's better to keep your current PSU rather than buy a new one. Sometimes if you have a very inefficient unit it's worth the upgrade. If you already have a plain jane 80plus PSU, then it would be a waste of cash to upgrade.For instance lets say your PC idles at 100w DC from the board. We will use a 500w power supply for an example.
Your plain jane 500w 80plus PSU idles at 80% efficiency and the fancy gold one idles at 87% efficiency. If you calculate it to the wall for the plain jane 100w/.8= 125w, the gold one is 100w/.87= ~115w. So we have a difference of 10w. If we calculate the idle power difference over a year at .10 per kwh then: ((10w*24*365)/1000) * .10 = $8.76 saved per year with your PC on 24/7.
If you bought a 500w gold unit say at newegg for $100 just to upgrade (and the braggin' rights) it would take you over 11 years to recoup your $100 idling your PC 24/7. I can see many peeps will proudly display their gold unit signature. :) Let's see if they keep their PSU for 10 + years!
If you were going for a new build and trying to decide whether to go for a plain jane 80 plus at $50 or the fancy gold one at $100 (for a difference of $50) it would take over 5 1/2 years to recoup your $50 idling 24/7. For some this might be reasonable depending on the price of electricity in their area, and how much they actually use their PC. If you don't use your PC a whole lot, the plain jane 80 plus will most likely be good enough.
Kibbles - Friday, January 22, 2010 - link
Don't forget the extra heat needs to be cooled during summers.But I agree, the savings is small especially since most people don't idle 24/7.
jasperjones - Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - link
Who pays $0.10 per kwh? Is that residential? I'm in NYC and pay ~$0.20.Calin - Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - link
Upgrade only if you have issues:*the air blown by the PSU is too hot
*computer is finicky (bad quality PSU could be the reason)
*you (actually) need more wattage
*your PSU is noisy, and you want a silent one
As seen in the page, one of those expensive PSU will happily provide you 15% or more power above nominal (no mention of the efficiency though, but it should probably be higher than 80%), while a low quality power supply might give you out-of-range voltages when reaching 90% load (or maybe even less than that)
beginner99 - Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - link
And not to mention that the fabrication of the PSU also consumes energy. If you throw away ur old 80% PSU that is still working to buy this one you are actually wasting energy. It's the same with cars. Manufacturing of a car (creating the steel, plasitics,...) consumes more energy than it will ever use while it's actually running. So trading in your old one for a new one is wasting energy.Main reason to buy this PSU is because of low noise. Efficient = less heat = lower fan speed = quieter. Simple.
Makaveli - Tuesday, January 19, 2010 - link
I also would like to see a PSU round up maybe in march time frame... :)I'm still sitting pretty with my Enermax Infinity 720 Watts right now, and you do make a good poing about Enermax PSU prices not dropping much.