3D Workstation Performance
Specviewperf performance was much like that seen in games. The Dual-Core performed about the same as a similar speed single core processor. The 500MHz speed increase provided performance increases in most benchmarks in the SPECviewperf 8.01 test suite. The exceptions are proe-03, sw-01, and ugs-04 which all seemed more tied in performance to the graphics card used for the benchmarking.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2c55/a2c55149d152326f31dfb8a41b1822b150332933" alt="3D Workstation Performance"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74a05/74a05c50f5142af6c19d1fba860e9d22cad98da9" alt="3D Workstation Performance"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e00bb/e00bbf773b3c4ed2eb5ee7fb3ff7bdb9254e3ac1" alt="3D Workstation Performance"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb21e/eb21e4b7f1c65797f290351e392d3bd6b88ca285" alt="3D Workstation Performance"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1925/e1925f3ab6401806a3b7bbcfd2334e45a62c37e3" alt="3D Workstation Performance"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/700c4/700c4789b219621688f81609fd6214e555bc6ac7" alt="3D Workstation Performance"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e457/0e457925a8c7e4fc9915820f013bd343d027aa64" alt="3D Workstation Performance"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14ed0/14ed0061f93911ddae14e5751d00671fd621af77" alt="3D Workstation Performance"
53 Comments
View All Comments
Googer - Thursday, June 23, 2005 - link
Correction:This is not an Apples to Apples compairison, This article should have compaired a 90nm Venice 2.2GHz 512k to a Manchester Dual Core 512k 2.2Ghz. Why was the 4000+ used as the compairison in an overclockability aricle? It does not even come from the same die.
Googer - Thursday, June 23, 2005 - link
This is not an Apples to Apples compairison, This article should have compaired a 90nm Venice 2.2GHz 512k to a Dual Core 512k x2 2.2Ghz. Why was the 4000+ used as the compairison for overclockability aricle?Googer - Thursday, June 23, 2005 - link
Lets get First POST Cr*P out of the way